Featured post
More Posts you might have missed on the other site
Here, in order from oldest to most recent are the not-exactly-numerous posts that have appeared on the other site in the past two and a half...
Friday, 21 October 2016
Thursday, 6 October 2016
You may have missed these
Since I effectively closed the blog at this url you might have missed the following:
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/the-insanity-of-neoliberalism-some.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/thinking-about-identity-in-early.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/what-kind-of-britain-do-you-imagine-you.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/the-madness-of-post-referendum-neo.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/one-hundredth-anniversary.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/gender-in-merovingian-world.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/rethinking-warfare-and-politics-in.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/worlds-of-arthur-sequel.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/the-value-of-knowledge-of-history-in.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/the-insanity-of-neoliberalism-some.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/thinking-about-identity-in-early.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/what-kind-of-britain-do-you-imagine-you.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/the-madness-of-post-referendum-neo.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/one-hundredth-anniversary.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/gender-in-merovingian-world.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/rethinking-warfare-and-politics-in.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/worlds-of-arthur-sequel.html
https://edgyhistorian.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/the-value-of-knowledge-of-history-in.html
Monday, 8 August 2016
Dead Blog?
Because of serial spam attacks which the Blogger platform seems unable to deal with (yes - people warned me about Blogger), I have moved the blog elsewhere albeit still on Blogger - edgyhistorian[dot]blogspot[dot]com -where you will be able to find all the posts and comments here with the 600transfomer.blogspot.com address (substitute that bit for the new one and you'll get there) as well as posts made after the start of June 2016. People who have kindly followed this blog may wish to add the new address to your followed blogs list. Similarly, those bloggers who have kindly listed this one in their side-bars might wish to update their blog-rolls.
I did think of simply deleting this version but - gratifyingly - people have cited it, sometimes (thanks, James Palmer!) in published books, so I wanted to ensure that those links would still work.
Thanks.
Prof. Grumpy.
I did think of simply deleting this version but - gratifyingly - people have cited it, sometimes (thanks, James Palmer!) in published books, so I wanted to ensure that those links would still work.
Thanks.
Prof. Grumpy.
Monday, 6 June 2016
Philip Green: The insanity of neo-liberalism
‘Sir’ Philip Green, eh? What a guy. Knighted by Blair, a government advisor to Cameron. Now his business ‘skills’ have led to the collapse of the 90-year-old BHS business, the loss of 11,000 jobs and the collapse of the company pension fund that he raided. He is a fine example of unfettered neo-liberal capitalism.
In 2005, Green paid himself nearly £1.2bn. The figure I have seen is £1.17bn. Let us think a little about that. £1,170,000,000. That is £3,205,479.45 a day (that 45p matters; an extra £164 a year would make a big difference to a lot of people). The UK average wage is about £26,000 per an. Put another way, on every single day of 2005, ‘Sir’ Philip Green earned 123 times what the average UK wage-earner makes in a year. Every single day. In the year, he earned, in that payment alone, for I dare say he had other sources of income, the equivalent of what just shy of 45,000 (that’s forty-five thousand – the population of a small town or the average gate at, say, Old Trafford) average wage-earners made.
I’m not arguing that everyone only deserves the same pay or that no one should be allowed theirfinancial success or to earn great wealth. I have no particular objection to people being millionaires or even multimillionaires. But … £3million a day? Let's just let that sink in and – more than that – think how utterly pointless that amount of money is in one person's off-shore bank account, or even in one person’s on-shore bank account. How could you even spend it all?
Let’s think. You could buy all of the nine properties listed in this Telegraph piece on the most expensive properties in London and still have getting on for a billion pounds left over! Out of that, you could buy a couple of super-yachts like this or perhaps the world’s largest private vessel at a cost of $600m (£414.353m) and still have well over £500,000,000 (half a billion quid) to spare. So, let's buy one each of the ten most expensive types of car in the world. That's about £20m. We could hire 100 staff and flunkies for our houses and cars and yacht/s and pay them £30k p.a. each. Just to guard against future hiccups, we could set aside their wages for the next 10 years: £30m. Let's invest £20m in various funds which, all being well, ought to give us an income for life of a million a year, probably more. What else could we do? I know, we could buy another ten mansions around the world to sail to in the yacht (and maybe keep one of our super-cars at each). Roughly matching our London properties in price, with three staff at each, with wages for ten years: say another £250m? Blimey. We still have £180m left. Now we could invest it, but that would only yield even more income and the point of this thought experiment is to think how we could spend the money (and we’ve already set ourselves up with a million per an for life, so we hardly need to work again).. I’ll tell you what we could do. We could give 11,000 employees £16,363.63 each either as a bonus or – maybe better – into their pension fund, but oh dear, that smacks a bit of socialism. Maybe we could donate £180m to charity… Think of the good that could do. Or – get this – pay it as … tax?!?! Just that last bit? 15% of the total? You have to admit that £180,000,000 would be a reasonable shot in the arm to schools or hospitals. Hell, we could pay nearly ten percent of the entire country's university research budget for the year. But, oh dear again, we don’t like tax, do we? It's a dirty word. Oh, I know. A jet. We haven’t bought a private jet yet…
You see what I mean about the difficulty of spending it all? And what – really – would you do with nineteen mansions? Much more to the point, all that was in just one year. Even I am sufficient of a champagne socialist (call it aspiration if you will…) not to think it that much of an issue if someone possessed nineteen mansions around the world, ten super-cars, a super-yacht or two and a private jet at the end of a long career of hard work at the top end of the successful business world. But the experiment we have just indulged in concerned just one element of one year’s income. He could have paid himself £170m and said to the government ‘fuck it. Here’s half of this year’s university research budget for the whole country. You're welcome.’ Or, better, he could have not let the government off the hook and said ‘here: raise this year’s university research budget by 50%.’
One thing to remember at this point is that one person is earning this, literally almost unimaginable, wealth in one year in a country (and not merely a first-world country but a G12 country) where ever more people are descending into poverty and being dependent on food-banks.
Where does all that money go? In Green’s case it was shunted by a tax-avoidance dodge into his wife’s account in Monaco, which rather illustrates the left-wing Facebook meme that money paid to the rich just gets salted away off-shore rather than going back into the economy. All that money could instead have been distributed among the employees of the companies or in the creation of new jobs. As I have said, 45,000 average salaries could have been paid out of that sum. That probably misses the point that it wasn’t a sum he paid himself every year but it hardly negates the general issue. More to the point, those salaries would have been taxable (and the sort of legal tax avoidance that ordinary people go in for costs government revenues way less, even when multiplied by 45,000, than that indulged in by the super-rich) and the rest would have been spent in the UK economy.
People will doubtless defend Green on two scores. The first is that what he did is not illegal. That really is something that governments need to think about. Whether or not technically illegal, this sort of tax avoidance is profoundly unethical. Who pays for the education of Green’s workforce, or their health-care when they are sick, or for the roads and infrastructure on or by which his goods are transported, or for the police that maintain their security and the armed forces that protect them? By tax-dodging he is expecting us – and his own workforce – to pay for all that. For his own benefit (and remember, he benefits to an unimaginable extent).
The other defence, which I have seen proposed by the equally awful Karen Brady (though grudgingly I still have to respect her success in the boys’ own world of football-club ownership and admin), is that by creating jobs and business, he contributed enough to the economy and deserves his tax-free billions. I don’t think that that withstands the arguments above, and I don’t think it defends the sheer scale of the wealth being taken out of the country (he could, after all, have paid himself £100 million and still paid 100,000 employees a £10,000 bonus, which would have stayed in the country, without affecting the companies’ ‘bottom line’). In the thought experiment above, no more than a couple of hundred jobs were created, as much outside the UK as in. More importantly though, it is completely undermined by his long-term failure. Eleven years (and god knows how much additional wealth) later, he has ruined the business, screwed their pension fund and left 11,000 people jobless (whose benefits, insofar as this government will still allow them any, although their unemployment is no fault of their own) will have to be paid for by the rest of us. In the meantime, who has benefitted? Not many traditional Tory-voting demographics, that’s for sure. That money could have gone into sustaining rural communities, for instance and supporting farmers; companies of the sort that Green runs (generally dodging corporation tax too, remember) are the ones ruining the high street and forcing small businesses out. This is the short-termism of neo-liberalism, witnessed by heaven-knows-how-many of Osborne’s economic ‘policies’. Take as much money as you can, here and now and screw the rest, screw the future.
This isn’t just greedy. It's sociopathic.
Unimaginable, un-spendable wealth, looted by a few and taken abroad in unsustainable get-rich-quick schemes, benefitting almost no one. That is the utter insanity of extreme, unfettered neoliberal capitalism.
Wednesday, 1 June 2016
Why Sixth-Century History Doesn't Matter (any more or less than any other history)
I'm a sixth-century historian ... and let me tell you I look good for my age. Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen. I'll be here all week. Now please welcome Miss Elaine Page.
Be all that as it may, the VC of Queens University Belfast, Patrick Johnston (an oncologist) has recently said that 'society' (that thing that Thatcherites like him don't believe in, remember?) doesn't need people who specialise in the history of the sixth century.
***
For where does it go after that, generally non-history-specific, justification? Sadly, West retreats into an argument that important stuff happened in the sixth century that is, allegedly, 'relevant' today, and that knowing the history of these things gives them 'context'. Do you really need to know about the rise of Islam to understand ISIS (other than, as here [and ff.], to refute the dangerous banalities of 'top historian' Tom Holland)? What kind of meaningful context does a simple knowledge of the sixth century add to understanding the modern world? The response to Johnstone from QUB's own Immo Warntjes, however, doesn't even get as far as West's. All it is is a list of (to him at least) interesting things that happened in the sixth century. Mostly they are things of some interest to me too, as you'd expect, but I would hesitate to ascribe to any of them an innate importance. But is that all history has to differentiate it from any other humanities discipline? Knowing facts about the past? Chronicling and antiquarianism? Readers of this blog know full well that I do not accept that even knowing the 20th-century history of the Middle East helps you understand the rise of ISIS in and of itself. That too reduces history to simple chronicling and raises some pretty difficult (I'd say insurmountable) epistemological questions about causation and narrative.
Does, however, the defence of history need to go anywhere beyond the intrinsic interest of things that happened in the past? Is not knowledge for its own sake a valid defence? Obviously I sympathise with that ideal but in practice it has severe limitations. For, if just knowing about stuff is its own justification, then why not degrees in stamp-collecting, car-recognition, arithmetic or French vocabulary? If knowing facts about the past is qualitatively different from being able to, say, identify the date, origin and value of any stamp, sufficient to justify the payment of university salaries etc, one needs to have a cogent argument as to why, which goes beyond mere intellectual snobbery.
I have set out why I think history does matter before and I don't want to repeat all that, but do please read that post if you have not read it before. Suffice it to say that what matters about history applies to sixth-century history no more and no less than to the history of any other century. Why does it matter to train 21-year-olds in history? To help them critique sources of evidence - as Charles West says - and not just accept what they are told; to help them think about humanity and understand other human beings in other contexts too. But these things are not unique to history. What is (I propose)unique to history is not simply the knowledge of things that happened in the past, but the investigation of why they happened, of why people said they happened and of why they want you to think they happened; more so (perhaps) the knowledge of understanding why things happened involves the awareness of the other options that were available - the things that could have happened but didn't (and grasping why they didn't) - and of how no one historical state of affairs or set of outcomes is preordained to be the only, natural one. It didn't have to be like that then; it doesn't have to be like this now. This is the emancipatory potential of history, specifically.
To sum up, then, the history of the sixth century matters as much as the history of any other century not so much for the knowledge of all the things that happened so much as for the understanding of all the things that didn't.
---
***
Be all that as it may, the VC of Queens University Belfast, Patrick Johnston (an oncologist) has recently said that 'society' (that thing that Thatcherites like him don't believe in, remember?) doesn't need people who specialise in the history of the sixth century.
"Society doesn't need a sixth century historian. It needs a 21-year-old who really understands how to analyse things, understands the tenets of leadership [ahem. Irony klaxon] and contributing to society, who is a thinker and someone who has the potential to drive society forward."
OK. There are a lot of things you can wonder on the basis of this interview. One might ask why, given his utilitarian obsession, Johnston is running a University and not still working to cure cancer (might one assume that, like most university managers, he ran out of ideas in his area of academic specialisation and took the soft route to a £250,000 salary instead?); one might wonder whether Durham and Newcastle (QUB's partners in the 'Northern Bridge' post-graduate funding consortium) are not now asking themselves what kind of idiot they have got into bed with; one might seriously sit down and ask what this man really thinks education is about, or what mind-numbingly limited range of things he thinks can 'benefit society'; one might ponder what sort of grey, cultureless, dystopian hell his vision of a society 'benefited' and 'led' by his idea of Higher Education resembles*; and finally one would be forgiven for thinking on the basis of this interview that, if this is an example of the sort of people who manage (for they certainly don't lead) UKHE, the sorts of people, the sorts of intellectual second-raters (amongst whom there are more than a few historians), into whose hands British Higher Education has fallen, we should all just put our heads in our hands and weep.
Such is Johnston's staggering ignorance that one assumes he picked on 'sixth century history' (he doesn't actually specify BC or AD) because he thought it was a sort of obscure Dark Age topic that no one could possibly see as valuable and that no one would stand up for (that is, again, typical of the sort of bullying these people do). In that, at least, he was wrong. Various responses have sprung up which have led Johnston to issue a hasty statement clarifying how much 'respect' he has for history graduates. The details need not detain us; it is corporate bullshit. It is a sort of superficial climb-down at least but he dropped the veil on his real opinions and, one assumes, his real intentions if push comes to shove. (And he already has form in cutting back on the arts and humanities.)
***
Johnston's philistine, corporate dribblings are, however, no more than some of us have come to expect from University managers. It's the replies that I really despair about, for they give a pretty bleak indication of what historians think their discipline is about - or rather that, typically, they haven't got a clue what their discipline might be there for, other than as some sort of hobby or middle-class divertissement. Charles West, to his credit, asks what history is about, if not thinking and analysis. If one wants to be narrowly utilitarian, one can specify the ability to sift information critically, reach a conclusion and present that conclusion via reasoned argument in (in theory at any rate) cogent written or oral form, to a deadline. Ideally that is what a history graduate should be able to do, and it is very important (maybe in practice it's the most important thing; I don't know), but it is not, of course, something that is limited to History graduates. At that point, however, the serious argument for sixth-century history presented thus far fizzles out.
For where does it go after that, generally non-history-specific, justification? Sadly, West retreats into an argument that important stuff happened in the sixth century that is, allegedly, 'relevant' today, and that knowing the history of these things gives them 'context'. Do you really need to know about the rise of Islam to understand ISIS (other than, as here [and ff.], to refute the dangerous banalities of 'top historian' Tom Holland)? What kind of meaningful context does a simple knowledge of the sixth century add to understanding the modern world? The response to Johnstone from QUB's own Immo Warntjes, however, doesn't even get as far as West's. All it is is a list of (to him at least) interesting things that happened in the sixth century. Mostly they are things of some interest to me too, as you'd expect, but I would hesitate to ascribe to any of them an innate importance. But is that all history has to differentiate it from any other humanities discipline? Knowing facts about the past? Chronicling and antiquarianism? Readers of this blog know full well that I do not accept that even knowing the 20th-century history of the Middle East helps you understand the rise of ISIS in and of itself. That too reduces history to simple chronicling and raises some pretty difficult (I'd say insurmountable) epistemological questions about causation and narrative.
Does, however, the defence of history need to go anywhere beyond the intrinsic interest of things that happened in the past? Is not knowledge for its own sake a valid defence? Obviously I sympathise with that ideal but in practice it has severe limitations. For, if just knowing about stuff is its own justification, then why not degrees in stamp-collecting, car-recognition, arithmetic or French vocabulary? If knowing facts about the past is qualitatively different from being able to, say, identify the date, origin and value of any stamp, sufficient to justify the payment of university salaries etc, one needs to have a cogent argument as to why, which goes beyond mere intellectual snobbery.
I have set out why I think history does matter before and I don't want to repeat all that, but do please read that post if you have not read it before. Suffice it to say that what matters about history applies to sixth-century history no more and no less than to the history of any other century. Why does it matter to train 21-year-olds in history? To help them critique sources of evidence - as Charles West says - and not just accept what they are told; to help them think about humanity and understand other human beings in other contexts too. But these things are not unique to history. What is (I propose)unique to history is not simply the knowledge of things that happened in the past, but the investigation of why they happened, of why people said they happened and of why they want you to think they happened; more so (perhaps) the knowledge of understanding why things happened involves the awareness of the other options that were available - the things that could have happened but didn't (and grasping why they didn't) - and of how no one historical state of affairs or set of outcomes is preordained to be the only, natural one. It didn't have to be like that then; it doesn't have to be like this now. This is the emancipatory potential of history, specifically.
To sum up, then, the history of the sixth century matters as much as the history of any other century not so much for the knowledge of all the things that happened so much as for the understanding of all the things that didn't.
---
* This is what I imagine: a society in which disease is a thing of the past and businesses are all well led but in which no one has any capacity to create or critique culture or think sophisticated, questioning thoughts about the inevitable finitude of life, disease or no (there might, I suppose, be a core of characteristically pointless analytical philosophers providing cod-logically-truthful, cod-ethical arguments for the turning off of life-support systems, under the ironic banner of 'medical humanities'), or about whether business and capitalism are good things, or by what right people with 'useful' degrees claim to lead society, or whether 'driving society forward' is ipso facto a 'Good Thing', or by what criteria we judge what a Good Thing might be, or what the alternatives are; where no one has the sort of training that might help them improve the sophistication of that society's cultural life, or indeed do anything non-utilitarian except as some form of hobby. Or maybe that is what the 'non-leaders' do in their spare time, when not working zero-hours contracts for the businesses of the drivers and leaders or watching 1000 versions of strictly on the 1000 quality-free business- and utility-driven deregulated TV channels and getting their view of the world from the sorts of 'leaders' and 'drivers' that created Fox News and the Daily Mail. A society stuck in this rut ad infinitum for lack of anyone with the wit or imagination to challenge it and its models. That, I imagine, is the society that technocrats like Johnston and his ilk think universities are there to produce and maintain.
Wednesday, 13 April 2016
The Peoples of Northern Europe: Text updated
I have updated the text of the three previously-posted instalments of my chapter on 'The Peoples of Northern Europe' for the forthcoming Cambridge Archaeology of Late Antiquity.
Part 1 (Introduction, Political Geography, Preliminary analytical points)
Part 2 (Description of data)
Part 3 (Discussion)
Bibliography
Part 1 (Introduction, Political Geography, Preliminary analytical points)
Part 2 (Description of data)
Part 3 (Discussion)
Bibliography
Tuesday, 12 April 2016
Peoples of Northern Europe in Late Antiquity: A Bibliography
Here, in case it is of any use, is the doubtless rather hit and miss bibliography to my chapter on 'The Peoples of Northern Europe' for the forthcoming Cambridge Archaeology of Late Antiquity. It is based on the footnotes to that chapter so there's a lot of stuff left out on some pretty major topics (most obviously the recent stuff on the wetland areas of the Netherlands/NW Germany) because I couldn't cover everything. It is also heavily weighted towards the most recent stuff I could find, and preferably in English, given the publication, so a lot of classic stuff is missing too.
Primary Sources:
Gregory of Tours, Historiae: Gregory of Tours. The History of the Franks, trans. Thorpe, L.,
(Harmondsworth, 1974).
Notitia Dignitatum: Notitia Dignitatum accedunt Notitia Urbis
Constantinopolitanae et Latercula Provinciarum, ed. Seeck, O., (Frankfurt
am Main, 1876; repr. Frankfurt, 1962).
Tacitus, Germania: Tacitus: Germania, trans. Rives, J., (Oxford,
1999).
Táin Bó Cuailnge: The Tain.
Trans. T. Kinsella (Oxford, 1969)
Secondary Sources:
Abegg-Wigg, A., & Lau, N., (ed.)
(2014). Kammergräber im Barbaricum: Zu Einflüssen und Übergangsphänomenenvon der
vorrömischen Eisenzeit bis in die Völkerwanderungszeit (Schleswig),
Åberg, N., (1922). Die Franken und Westgoten in der
Völkerwanderungszeit (Uppsala).
Åberg, N., (1923). Die Goten
und Langobarden in Italien (Uppsala).
Åberg, N., (1926). The Anglo-Saxons in England (Uppsala).
Alföldi, M.R.-, (1997). ‘Germania magna – nicht libera.
Notizen zum römischen Wortgebrauch.’ Germania
75:45-52.
Almagor, E., & Skinner, J.,
(ed.) (2013). Ancient Ethnography: New
Approaches (London)
Andrzejowski, J., (2010). ‘The
Przeworsk Culture: A brief story (for the foreigners)’ in Worlds Apart? Contacts across the Baltic Sea in the Iron Age
(Nordiske Fortidsminder C/7: Copenhagen/Warsaw), pp.1-52
Arrhenius, B., & U.
O’Meadhra, U., (ed.) (2011). Excavations
at Helgö XVIII (Stockholm)
Autorenkollektiv (1983). Die Germanen. Geschichte und Kultur der
germanischen Stämme in Mitteleuropa. Ein Handbuch in zwei Bänden Vol.2
(Berlin).
Balsdon, J.P.V.D., (1979). Romans and Aliens (London).
Bazelmans, J., (2014). By Weapons Made Worthy: Lords, Retainers and
Their Relationship in Beowulf (Amsterdam Archaeological Studies)
Becker, M., (2009). ‘Germanische
Eliten der späten Römischen Kaiserzeit’, in Burmeister & Derks (ed.)
(2009), pp.358-69.
Bemmann, J., (1999).
‘Körpergräber der jungeren römischen Kaiserzeit und Völkerwanderungszeit aus
Schleswig Holstein. Zum Aufkommen einer neuen Bestattungssitte im
überregionalen Vergleich.’ Studien zur Sachsenforschung
13:5-45.
Besteman, J.C., Bos, J.M.,
Gerrets, D.A., Heidinga, H.A., & de Koning, J., (1999). The Excavations at Wijnaldum. Reports on
Frisia in Roman and Early Medieval Times (Rotterdam).
Bona, I., (1976). The Dawn of the Dark Ages: The Gepids and
Lombards in the Carpathian Basin (Budapest).
Bonfante, L., (ed.) (2011). The
Barbarians of Ancient Europe: Realities and Interactions. (Cambridge).
Borg, K., Näsman, U., &
Wegraus, E., (ed.) (1976). Eketorp.
Fortification and Settlement in Öland/Sweden. The Monument. (Stockholm).
Brather, S., (2004). Ethnische
Interpretationen in der frühgeschichtlichen Archäologie: Geschichte, Grundlagen
und Alternativen (Berlin).
Brather, S., (2009). ‘Dwellings
and settlements among the Lombards’ in The
Langobards Before the Frankish Conquest, ed. G. Ausenda, P. Delogu &
C.J. Wickham (Woodbridge), pp.30-68.
Burmeister, S., & Derks, H.,
(ed.), 2000 Jahre Varusschlacht: Konflikt (Stuttgart, 2009).
Burnell, S., (1998). Die reformierte Kirche von Sissach BL.
Mittelalterliche Kirchenbauten und merowingerzeitliche “Stiftergräber”
(Liestal).
Brink-Kloke, H., &
Meurers-Balke, J. (2003). ‘Siedlungen und Gräber am Oespeler Bach (Dortmund) –
eine Kulturlandschaft im Wandel der Zeiten.’ Germania 81:47-146.
Campbell, E., (1999). Saints and
sea-kings: the first kingdom of the Scots (Edinburgh)
Campbell, E. (2007) Continental and Mediterranean
Imports to Atlantic Britain and Ireland, AD 400-800. (York).
Capelle, T., (1998). Die Sachsen des frühen Mittelalters
(Stuttgart)
Clarke, D., Blackwell, A., &
Goldberg, M., Early Medieval Scotland.
Individuals, Communities and Ideas (Edinburgh).
Collins, R., & Gerrard, J.,
(ed.) (2004). Debating Late Antiquity in
Britain, AD300-700 (Oxford).
Crone, A., & Campbell, E.,
(2005). A Crannog of the First Millennium
AD. Excavations by Jack Scott at Loch Glashan, Argyll, 1960 (Edinburgh)
Crubézy, E., (1990). ‘Merovingian
skull deformations in the south-west of France’ From the Baltic to the Black Sea. Studies in Medieval Archaeology (One
World Archaeology 18), ed. Austin, D., & Alcock, L., (London),
pp.189-208
Curta, F., (ed.) (2010). Neglected Barbarians (Turnhout).
Dench, E., (1995). From
Barbarians to New Men. Greek, Roman and Modern Perceptions of Peoples from the
Central Apennines (Oxford).
Dickinson, T.M., & Griffiths,
D., (ed.) (1999). The Making of Kingdoms (Anglo-Saxon Studies in History and
Archaeology 10) (Oxford).
Dijkstra, M.F.P. (2011). Rondom de Mondingen van Rijn & Maas.
Landschap en Bewoning Tussen de 3e en 9e EEuw in Zuid-Holland, in het Bijzonder
de Oude Rijnstreek (Leiden).
Drinkwater, J.F., (2007). The Alamanni and Rome 213-496. Caracalla to
Clovis (Oxford).
Dunbar, L., & Maldonado, A.,
with McLaren, D., & Melikian, M., (2012). A long cist cemetery near
Auchterforfar Farm, Forfar, Angus – Christian or pre-Christian? Tayside and Fife Archaeological Journal
18, pp.63-80.
Edwards, N., (1996). The Archaeology of Early Medieval Ireland (paperback
edition: London).
Eger, C., (2014). ’Early
migration period hillforts in southern Germany. State of research and
interpretation’, in Las Fortificaciones en la Tardoantigüedad.
Élites y articulación del Territorio (Siglos V-VIII d.C.), ed. Catalán
Ramos, R., Fuentes, P., & Sastre Blanco, J.C., (Madrid), pp.21-42
Elton, H., (1996a).
Frontiers of the Roman Empire (London).
Elton, H., (1996b). Warfare in Roman Europe, 350-425
(Oxford).
Esmonde Cleary, S., (2013).
‘Northern Britain in late antiquity’ Antiquité
Tardive 21:33-44.
Ethelberg, P., (2011). Early
state formation in southern Scandinavia: a proposal for a hierarchical
terminology’, in The Iron Age on Zealand:
Status and Perspectives, ed. L. Boye (Copenhagen, 2011), pp.67-73.
Ethelberg, P., Jensen, S., Jørgensen, L.B.,
& Madsen, T., (1986). Hjemsted-en
gravplads fra 4. og 5. årh. e. Kr (Haderslev)
Feachem, R.W., (1955-56). ‘The
fortifications of Traprain Law.’ Proceedings of the Society of Antiquities
for Scotland
89:284-9.
Fischer, S., (2014). ‘Swedish Migration Period
Chamber Graves’, in Abegg-Wigg & Lau (ed.) (2014), pp.401-21
Fischer, S., & Victor, H., (2011).
‘New Horizons for Helgö’
in Arrhenius
& O’Meadhra (ed.) (2011), pp.79-92.
Foster, S., (2014). Picts, Gaels and Scots: Early Historic
Scotland (2nd edition: Edinburgh)
Fraser, J., (2009). From Caledonia to Pictland. Scotland to 795
(Edinburgh).
Fries-Knoblach, Steuer, H., &
Hines, J., (ed.) (2014). The Baiuvarii
and Thuringi. An Ethnographic Perspective (Woodbridge).
Fuchs, R., Kempa, M., Redies, R.,
Theune-Großkopf, B., & Wais, A. (ed.) (1997). Die Alamannen (2nd
edition; Stuttgart).
Fulford, M.G., (1985). ‘Roman
material in barbarian society, c.200BC- a.d. 400’, in Settlement and Society, ed. T. Champion & J.V.S. Megaw
(Leicester, 1985), pp.91-108.
Galestin, M.C., (2010). ‘Roman
artefacts beyond the northern frontier: interpreting the evidence from the
Netherlands.’ European Journal of Archaeology
13.1, pp.64-88.
Gebühr, M., (2009). ‘Reiche
Bauern oder Fürsten.’ In Burmeister & Derks (ed.) (2009), pp.342-51
Geiberger, M., Stute, A., &
Hofmann, A., (ed.) (2005). Imperium
Romanum: Römer, Christen, Alamannen – Die Spätantike am Oberrhein
(Stuttgart).
Geuenich, D. (ed.) (1998). Die
Franken und die Alemannen bis zur “Schlacht bei Zülpich” (Berlin).
Goetz, H-W., Jarnut, J., &
Pohl, W., (ed.) (2003). Regna and Gentes: The Relationship between
late Antique and Early Medieval Peoples and Kingdoms in the Transformation of
the Roman World (Leiden).
Goffart, W., (2006). Barbarian Tides. The Migration Age and the
Later Roman Empire (Philadelphia)
Haarnagel, W., (1979). Die Grabung Feddersen Wierde: Methode,
Hausbau, Siedlungs- und Wirtschaftsformen, sowie Sozialstruktur (Wiesbaden ).
Hall, E., (1989). Inventing the Barbarian (Oxford).
Halsall (2000). Burial customs
around the North Sea, AD 350-700’ in Kramer et
al. (ed.) (2000), pp.93-104.
Halsall, G., (2007). Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West,
376-568 (Cambridge).
Halsall, G., (2009). ‘Beyond the
northern frontiers’, in A Companion to
Late Antiquity, ed. P. Rousseau & J. Raithel (Oxford), pp.409-25
Halsall, G., (2011). ‘Ethnicity and early
medieval cemeteries.’ Arqueología y
Territorio Medieval 18 (2011), pp.15-27.
Halsall, G., (2013). ‘Northern
Britain and the fall of the Roman Empire’. The
Mediaeval Journal 2:1-25.
Halsall, G., (2014). ‘Two worlds
become one: a ‘counter-intuitive’ view of the Roman Empire and ‘Germanic’
Migration’. German History 32:515-32
Hamerow, H., (2002). Early Medieval Settlements. The Archaeology
of Rural Communities in North-West Europe 400-900 (Oxford).
Hammer, C., (2011). ‘Early
medieval Bavaria: A late antique Italian perspective.’ Journal of Late Antiquity 4.2, pp.217-44.
Hansen, H.J., (1989), ‘Dankirke:
Affluence in Late Iron Age Denmark’ in The Birth of Europe. Archaeology and
Social Development in the First Millennium A.D. ed. K. Randsborg (Rome), pp. 123–8.
Hårdh, B., (2003). ‘The contacts
of a central place’ in Larsson & Hårdh (ed.) (2003), pp.27-66.
Hardt, M., (2003). ‘The
Bavarians’, in Goetz, Jarnut & Pohl (ed.) (2003), pp.429-61.
Hausmair, B., (2015). Am Rande des Grabs. Todeskonzepte und
Bestattungsritual in der frühmittelalterlichen Almannia (Vienna).
Heather, P., (1996). The Goths (Oxford).
Heather, P. (1998). ‘Disappearing
and reappearing tribes’, in Pohl & Reimitz (ed.) 1998, pp.95-111
Heather, P., (2001). ‘The late
Roman art of client management: Imperial defence in the fourth-century west’ in
The Transformation of Frontiers. From
Late Antiquity to the Carolingians, ed. W. Pohl, I.N. Wood & H. Reimitz
(Leiden), pp.15-72.
Heather, P., (2005). The Fall
of Rome: A New History (London).
Heather, P., & Matthews, J.,
(1991). The Goths in the Fourth Century
(Liverpool).
Hedeager, L., (1978). ‘A
quantitative analysis of Roman imports in Europe north of the Limes (0-400 AD) and the question of
Roman-Germanic exchange.’ Studies in
Scandinavian Prehistory and Early History 1, pp.191-216.
Hedeager, L., (1987). ‘Empire,
frontier and the barbarian hinterland: Rome and northern Europe from AD 1-400’,
in Centre and Periphery in the Ancient World, ed. M. Rowlands, M.,
Larsen & K. Kristiansen (Cambridge), pp.125-40.
Henderson, G., & Henderson,
I., (2004). The Art of the Picts:
Sculpture and Metalwork in Early Medieval Scotland (London).
Hodder, I., (1986). Reading the Past. Current Approaches to
Interpretation in Archaeology (1st edition; Cambridge)
Hoeper, M., & Steuer, H.,
‘Eine völkerwanderungszeitliche Höhenstation am Oberrhein—der Geißkopf bei
Berghaupten, Ortenaukreis—Höhensiedlung, Militärlager oder Kultplatz?’, Germania,
77 (1999), pp. 185–246.
Horsnaes, H.W., (2013).
‘Networking in north-eastern barbaricum: a study of gold imitations of Roman
coins’, in From Goths to Varangians:
Communications and Cultural Exchange Between the Baltic and the Black Sea,
ed. Bjerg, L., Lind, J.H., & Sindbaek, S.M., (Aarhus), pp.87-130.
Hunter, F., (2007). Beyond the Edge of Empire – Caledonians,
Picts and Romans (Groam House Museum, Rosemarkie).
Hunter & Painter
Hvass, S., (1983). ‘Vorbasse: The
development of a settlement through the first millennium AD.’ Journal of
Danish Archaeology 2:127-36.
Ilkjaer, J., (2001). Illerup-Ådal – Archaeology as a magic mirror
(Moesgård).
James, S., (2005). ‘Large-scale
recruitment of auxiliaries from Free Germany?’, in Limes XIX: Proceedings of the XIXth International Congress of Roman
Frontier Studies held in Pécs, Hungary, September 2003, ed. Visy, Z., (Pécs),
pp.273-279
Jensen, J., (2003). The Prehistory of Denmark (2nd
edition: London)
Jensen, S., (1991).
‘Dankirkje-Ribe. Fra handelsgård til handelsplads’ in Morotensen &
Rasmussen (ed.) (1991), pp.73-87.
Kaizer, T., & Hekster, O.,
(ed.) (2010). Impact of Empire, vol.13.
Frontiers in the Roman World. Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop of the
International Network Impact of Empire (Durham 16-19 April 2009) (Leiden).
Kharalambieva, A., (2010).
‘Gepids in the Balkans: A survey of the archaeological evidence’, in Curta (ed.)
(2010), pp.245-62.
Kleemann, J., (1999). ‘Zum
Aufkommen der Körperbestattung in Niedersachsen.’ Studien zur Sachsenforschung 13:253-62
Klevnäs, A., (2015). ‘Abandon Ship! Digging out the Dead from
the Vendel Boat-Graves.’ Norwegian
Archaeological Review 48, pp.1-20.
Koch, U., (1968). Die Grabfünde der
Merowingerzeit aus dem Donautal um Regensburg (Germanischer Dankmäler de
Völkerwanderungszeit. A.10) (2 vols.: Berlin)
Kramer, E., Stouman, I, & Greg, A., (ed.) (2000). Kings of the North Sea, AD 250-850 (Leeuwarden).
Lamm, J.P., & Nordstrom, H.,
(ed.) (1983). Statens Historiska Museum,
Studies 2: Vendel Period (Stockholm).
Larrick, R., (1986). ‘Age grading
and ethnicity in the style of Loikop (Samburu) spears.’ World Archaeology
18:269-83.
Larsson, L., & Hårdh, B.,
(ed.) (2003). Centrality-Regionality. The
Social Structure of Southern Sweden during the Iron Age. Uppåkrastudier 7 (Archaeologia Lundensia Series in octo 40)
(Lund).
Lee, A.D., (1993). Information and Frontiers. Roman Foreign
Relations in Late Antiquity (Cambridge).
Lowe, C., (1999). Angels,
Fools and Tyrants: Britons and Anglo-Saxons in Southern Scotland
(Edinburgh).
Maldonado, A., (2013). ‘Burial in
Early Medieval Scotland: New Questions.’ Medieval
Archaeology 57, pp.1-34.
Mejdahl, U., & Siemen, P., (2000). ‘Living around the North Sea’ in
Kramer et al. (ed.) (2000), pp.79-92.
Memorial Colloquium Haarnagel (2010). Gedächtnis-Kolloquium/Memorial
Colloquium Werner Haarnagel (1907–1984): Herrenhöfe und die Hierarchie der
Macht im Raum südlich und östlich der Nordsee von der Vorrömischen Eisenzeit
bis zum frühen Mittelalter und zur Wikingerzeit/Herrenhöfe and the Hierarchy of
Power in the Region to the South and East of the North Sea from the Pre-Roman
Iron Age until the Early Middle Ages and the Viking Age. (Leidorf).
Menghin, W., (ed.), (1987). Germanen, Hunnen und Awaren: Schätze der
Völkerwanderungszeit (Nürnberg).
Meyer, M., (2015). ‘Roman
cultural influence in western Germania
Magna’, in Oxford Handbook of Roman
Germany, ed. S. James & S. Krmnicek (Oxford), http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199665730.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199665730-e-8
(accessed 08/04/2016).
Moerman, M. (1968). ‘Being Lue: Use and abuses of ethnic
identification’ in Essays on the Problem
of Tribe Proceedings of the 1967 Annual Spring Meeting of the American
Ethnological Society, ed. Helm, J., (Seattle), pp.153-69.
Mortensen, P., & Rasmussen, B.M.,
(ed.) (1991). Fra Stamme til Stat I
Denmark 2. Høvdingesamfund og Kongemagt (Aarhus).
Myhre, B., (1985). ‘Boathouses as
indicators of political organization.’ Norwegian
Archaeological review 18, pp.36-60.
Myhre, B., (1997). ‘Boathouses
and naval organisation’, in Military
Aspects of Scandinavian Society in a European Perspective AD 1-1300, ed. Nørgård Jørgensen, A., & Claussen,
B.L. (Copenhagen), pp.169-83.
Myhre, B., (2003). ‘The Iron
Age’, in The Cambridge History of Scandinavia ,
volume 1: From prehistory to 1520, ed. Helle, K., (Cambridge ), pp.60-93.
Näsman, U., (1999). ‘The
ethnogenesis of the Danes and the Making of a Danish kingdom’, in Dickinson
& Griffiths (ed.) (1999), pp.1-10
Näsman, U., & Wegraus, E.,
(ed.), (1979). Eketorp. Fortification and
Settlement on Öland/Sweden. The Setting (Stockholm).
Neuffer-Müller, C., (1983). Der alamannische Adelsbestattungsplatz und
die Reihengräberfriedhöfe von Kirchheim am Ries (Ostalbkreis) (Forschungen und
Berichte zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte in Bade, Band 15) (Stuttgart)
Neumaier, H., (1997). ‘,Freies
Germanien’/,Germania libera’ – Zur
Genese eines historischen Begriffs.’ Germania
75:53-67.
Nicolay, J.A.W., (2014). The Splendour of Power: Early Medieval
Kingship and the Use of Gold and Silver in the Southern North Sea Area (5th to
7th Century AD) (Groningen)
Nielsen, P.O., Randsborg, K. & Thrane, H. (ed.) (1994). The
archaeology of Gudme and Lundeborg (Copenhagen ).
Nieuwhof, A., (2011). ‘Discontinuity in the Northern-Netherlands coastal
area at the end of the Roman Period’ Neue
Studien zur Sachsenforschung 3, pp.55-66.
Nuber, H.U., (1998). ‘Zur
Entstehung des Stammes der Alamanni aus römischer Sicht’, in Geuenich
(ed.) (1998), pp.367-83.
Ó Cróinín, D., (1995). Early Medieval Ireland 400-1200
(Harlow).
Ó Cróinín, D., (2005). ‘Ireland
400-800’, in Ó Cróinín (ed.) (2005), pp.182-234.
Ó Cróinín, D., (ed.) (2005). A New History of Ireland vol.1: Prehistoric
and Early Ireland (Oxford).
O’Sullivan, A., McCormick, F.,
Kerr, T.R., & Harvey, L., (2013). Early
Medieval Ireland from Archaeological Excavations (Dublin)
Obertová, Z., (2008). The
Early Medieval Alamannic Population at Horb-Altheim (450-510) (Rahden)
Paulsen, P., 1967). Alamannische Adelsgräber von
Niederstotzingen (Kreis Heidenheim) (Stuttgart).
Pohl, W., (1988). ‘Telling the
Difference: Signs of ethnic identity’, in Pohl & Reimitz (ed.) (1988) pp.17-69.
Pohl, W., (2000). Die Germanen (Munich).
Pohl, W., & Reimitz, H.,
(ed.) (1988). Strategies of Distinction. The
Construction of Ethnic Communities, 300-800, (Leiden).
Quast, D. (2009). ‘Frühgeschichtliche
Prunkgräberhorizonte’, in Aufstieg und Untergang. Zwischenbilanz des Forschungsschwerpunktes
»studien zu genese und struktur von eliten in vor- und frühgeschichtlichen
gesellschaften« ed. M. Egg & D. Quast (Monographien des
Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Band 82, Mainz), pp.107-42
Quast, D., (2014). ‘Die
Steinkammergräber aus Wrocław-Zakrzów’ Kammergräber im Barbaricum’ in Abegg-Wigg
& Lau (ed.) (2014) pp.323-42.
Raemakers, D.C.M., (ed.) (2013). A kaleidoscope of maritime
perspectives: Essays on the archaeology, art history and landscape history of
the maritime world view, (Groningen)
Ralston, I., (2004). The Hillforts of Pictland since ‘The Problem
of the Picts’ (Groam House Museum, Rosemarkie)
Reuter, M., (2003). Die römisch-frühvölkerwanderungszeitliche
Siedlung von Wurmlingen, Kr. Tuttlingen (Stuttgart).
Reuter, M., (2005). ‘Leben in
römischen Ruinen. Die germanischen Neueinwanderer in Südwestdesutschland und
das römische Erbe’, in Geiberger, Stute & Hofmann (ed.) (2005), pp.111-8.
Robinson, D., & Siemen, P.,
(1988). ‘A Roman Iron Age funerary deposit from Praestestien, southwestern
Jutland, and the early cultivation of rye in Denmark’, Antiquity 62, pp.697-703
Rundkvist, M.,
(2003). Barshalder 2. Studies of Late
Iron Age Gotland (Stockholm)
Sarantis, A., (2010). ‘The
Justinianic Herules: from allied barbarians to Roman provincials’, in Curta
(ed.) (2010), pp.361-402.
Schach-Dörges (1997).
‘“Zusammengespülte und vermengte Menschen”’ in Fuchs et al (ed.) (1997), pp.79-102.
Schmidt, B., (1983). ‘Die
Thüringer’, in Autorenkollektiv (1983), pp.502-48
Schmidt, B., (1987). ‘Das
Königreich der Thüringer und seine Provinzen’, in Menghin (ed.) (1987),
pp.471-80.
Schmidt, B., (1997). ‘Das
Königreich der Thüringer und seine Eingliederung in das Frankenreich’, in
Wieczorek, Périn, von Welck & Menghin (ed.), (1997), pp.285-97.
Schön, M., (1999). Feddersen Wierde, Fallward, Flögeln:
Archäologie im Museum Burg Bederkesa, Landkreis Cuxhaven (Bremerhaven).
Schrijver, P. (2013). The economic growth of terp-settlements
related to their accessibility through waterways, in Raemaekers (ed.) (2013), pp. 117-124
Shanks, M., & Tilley, C.,
(1987a). Re-Constructing Archaeology:
Theory and Practice (1st edition: Cambridge)
Shanks, M., & Tilley, C.,
(1987b). Social Theory and Archaeology (1st
edition: Cambridge)
Siegmund, F., (2003). ‘Social
relations among the old Saxons’, in
The Continental Saxons from the Migration Period to the Tenth
Century: An Ethnographic Perspective, Green, D.H., & Siegmund, F., (Woodbridge),
pp.77-95.
Skinner, J.E., (2012). The Invention of Greek Ethnography. From
Homer to Herodotus (Oxford).
Solberg, B., (2009). ‘Norwegian
Weapon Graves and Regional Diversity in the Roman and Migration Periods’, in Brattli, T., (ed.) Vitark 7. The 58th International Sachsensymposium: 1-5 September, 2007. (Trondheim),
pp.147-155
Solberg, B., (2015). ‘From Paganism
to Christianity in Norway - An examination of Graves and Grave Finds’, in Baug, I., Mygland, S., Larsen, J.,
(ed.) Nordic Middle Ages - Artefacts,
Landscapes and Society. Essays in Honour of Ingvild Øye on her 70th Birthday
(Bergen), pp. 275-288
Springer, M., (2004). Die Sachsen (Stuttgart).
Stein, F., (1967). Adelsgäber des achten Jahrhunderts in
Deutschland (2 vols.: Berlin)
Steinacher, R., (2010). ‘The
Herules: Fragments of a history’, in Curta (ed.) (2010), pp.319-60.
Steuer, H. (2005). ‘Die Alamannia
und die Besiedlung des rechtsrheinischen Hinterlands’, in Geiberger, Stute
& Hofmann (ed.) 2005, pp.26-41.
Stilborg, O., (1997). Shards of Iron Age Communication. A
Ceramological Study of Internal Structure and External Contact in the
Gudme-Lundeborg Area, Funen, during the Late Roman Iron Age (Lund).
Stout, M., (1997). The Irish Ringfort (Dublin).
Stylegar, F.-A.,
(2014). ‘Chamber graves and other ‘oversized’ graves in Roman and Migration
Period Norway’ in Abegg-Wigg & Lau (ed.) (2014), pp.191-206
Stylegar, F.-A., & Grimm, O., (2005). ‘Boathouses in Northern Europe
and the North Atlantic.’
The International Journal of Nautical
Archaeology 34.2, pp.253–268.
Swift, C., (2009). Ogam stones and the earliest Irish Christians (Maynooth)
Thasing, S. (2013). ‘On terpen from Flanders up to Frisia: Two
maritime regions from the last centuries BC until the Late Middle Ages compared’,
in
Raemaekers (ed.) (2013), pp. 89-96
Theuws, F., & Hiddink, H.,
(1997). ‘Der Kontakt zu Rom’, in Wieczorek et
al. (ed.) (1997), pp.66-80.
Thurston, L., (2002). Landscapes of Power, Landscapes of Conflict.
State Formation in the South Scandinavian Iron Age (New York)
Tipper, J., (2004) The Grubenhaus in Anglo-Saxon England: An
analysis and interpretation of the evidence from Anglo-Saxon England’s most
distinctive building type (Yedingham).
Todd, M., (1987). The Northern Barbarians, 100BC - AD 300
(rev. ed; Oxford).
Van Es, W., (1967), Wijster. A Native Village Beyond the
Imperial Frontier (Groningen).
van Ossel, P., & Ouzoulias,
P. (2000). ‘Rural settlement economy in northern Gaul in the late Empire: An
overview and assessment.’ Journal of Roman
Archaeology 13, pp.133-60.
Viberg, A., Victor, H., Fischer,
S., Lidén, K., & Andrén, A., (2014). ‘The ringfort by the sea: archaeological
geophysical prospection and excavations at Sandby borg (Öland).’ Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 44.3,
pp.413-28.
von Carnap-Bornheim, C., (2014).
‘Zum Stand der Erforschung des Thorsberger Moorfundes - Fazit’, in Das Thorsberger Moor. Bd. 4. Fund- und
Forschungsgeschichte, naturwissenschaftliche und materialkundliche
Untersuchungen C. von Carnap-Bornheim (Schleswig 2014) 421-444.
Voss, H.-U., (2009). Eine frühe Dynastie in Mecklenburg.
Fürstengräber de älteren Kaiserzeit von Hagenow’, in 2000 Jahre Varusschalcht: Konflikt, ed. S. Burmeister & H.
Derks (Stuttgart), pp.352-5.
von Carnap-Bornheim, C., (2015). ‘The Germani and the German Provinces of
Rome’ in The Oxford Handbook of the
Archaeology of Roman Germany ed.
James, S., & Stefan Krmnicek, S., (Oxford), (online resource: accessed
08/04/16)
Wainwright, F.T., (ed.) (1955). The
Problem of the Picts (London).
Ward-Perkins, B., (2005). The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilisation
(Oxford).
Welch, M., (2000). ‘Trade and
trading places around the North Sea’, in Kramer, et al. (ed.) (2000), pp.67-78.
Wells, P.S., (ed.) (2013). Rome Beyond its Frontiers: Imports,
Attitudes and Practices (JRA Supplementary Series 94: Portsmouth, RI).
Wickler, S., & Nilsen, G.,
(2012). ‘Pre-Modern Boathouses: a
maritime perspective from northern Norway.’ The
International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 41.1, pp.106–119
Wieczorek, A., Périn, P., von Welck,
K., & Menghin, W., (ed.) (1997). Die Franken: Wegberieter Europas (2nd
edition; Mainz).
Whittaker, C.R, (1994). Frontiers of the Roman Empire (Baltimore, Maryland).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)